<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So begins the farewell to Windows 2003</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.barkingseal.com/2009/10/so-begins-the-farewell-to-windows-2003/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.barkingseal.com/2009/10/so-begins-the-farewell-to-windows-2003/</link>
	<description>Applied Trust off-leash: IT infrastructure, security, and performance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 20:30:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul</title>
		<link>http://www.barkingseal.com/2009/10/so-begins-the-farewell-to-windows-2003/comment-page-1/#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barkingseal.com/?p=973#comment-98</guid>
		<description>Steven,

I&#039;ve brought this up several times with people since writing the post, and the typical reaction has been &quot;what? really?&quot;. Even with only nine months to go (one down already!), there is still time to assess the importance of systems if such internal classifications don&#039;t already exist, and prioritize upgrade plans accordingly. Entering EHFS doesn&#039;t mean everyone will need/want to upgrade every system, however for mission critical apps, it&#039;s probably a good idea to assess just how critical hotfix support is.

For many, it will be unrealistic to plan on having every system and and application tested and upgraded to a 2008 platform by July of next year. However, there is plenty of time to plan and upgrade select mission critical systems in a managed fashion, for which hotfixes and ongoing non-security support are deemed critical. 

This leaves other systems running on a platform that is certainly mature, and likely to function in an acceptable manner without necessarily needing hotfixes.  It does serve as a salient reminder that after July, the next support change will be the end of security patches as well.

Policy-wise, now would be a great time to clearly state that new Server 2003 deployments should not be entertained without clear justification warranting an exception, and that rebuilds and hardware refreshes should also include a 2008 upgrade if possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steven,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve brought this up several times with people since writing the post, and the typical reaction has been &#8220;what? really?&#8221;. Even with only nine months to go (one down already!), there is still time to assess the importance of systems if such internal classifications don&#8217;t already exist, and prioritize upgrade plans accordingly. Entering EHFS doesn&#8217;t mean everyone will need/want to upgrade every system, however for mission critical apps, it&#8217;s probably a good idea to assess just how critical hotfix support is.</p>
<p>For many, it will be unrealistic to plan on having every system and and application tested and upgraded to a 2008 platform by July of next year. However, there is plenty of time to plan and upgrade select mission critical systems in a managed fashion, for which hotfixes and ongoing non-security support are deemed critical. </p>
<p>This leaves other systems running on a platform that is certainly mature, and likely to function in an acceptable manner without necessarily needing hotfixes.  It does serve as a salient reminder that after July, the next support change will be the end of security patches as well.</p>
<p>Policy-wise, now would be a great time to clearly state that new Server 2003 deployments should not be entertained without clear justification warranting an exception, and that rebuilds and hardware refreshes should also include a 2008 upgrade if possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Till</title>
		<link>http://www.barkingseal.com/2009/10/so-begins-the-farewell-to-windows-2003/comment-page-1/#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Till</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 14:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barkingseal.com/?p=973#comment-92</guid>
		<description>Interesting stuff. I didn&#039;t realize the change was going to have that kind of impact. What are your thoughts about that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting stuff. I didn&#8217;t realize the change was going to have that kind of impact. What are your thoughts about that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
